As is regularly the case, the daily mail readership and facebook contigent are up in arms about something. “Old lady puts cat in bin! ” They shout “Horric evil old crone in animal cruelty shock”, “Tubby witch dumps moggy” etc…
Now, cats are a pain in the ass, but I’ve never considered actually placing one in danger or hurting it (except if they get hit from a potato which I’ll hurl at them if they shit on my lawn). This women obviously had other ideas. It’s quite intriguing watching the video because you can see this thought process; an idea turning into a plan, into action…
but anyway…
She’s under police protection now apparently, nothing like a good witch-hunt to get the blood going. This is the thing which really grinds my gears
Yes, I do think the act was contemptible, and she deserves prosecution for animal cruelty; but if it had been someone under 25 then this would probably never have made the news (the cat owner said she expected it to be some yobs), what makes this women more of a target for the ‘torch and pitchfork’ brigade?
Also, why are people only enraged to the point of viligantism when they see a video like this, which doesn’t contain direct cruelty, but are happy to skim over newspaper reports of a lad mutilating a cat (or even videos, which have been published on youtube in the past) with a less venomous reaction than this, certainly not the desire to publicly denounce with such vitriol?
Just my thoughts… the modern media love to stoke-up reactions as it ‘makes’ the story. I think sometimes the reaction should be checked as to whether it’s warranted or not.


